9911796707
|
Home
Issues Involved:
1. Whether the society's objectives qualify as charitable under section 2(15) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. 2. Whether the society should be granted registration under section 12A of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Issue-Wise Detailed Analysis: 1. Whether the society's objectives qualify as charitable under section 2(15) of the Income-tax Act, 1961: The society, registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860, claimed to be a charitable institution with objectives including promoting social and recreational activities, fostering unity, organizing cultural functions, providing medical relief, and promoting civil amenities. The Commissioner of Income-tax (CIT) denied registration, arguing that the society's benefits were limited to an identifiable group of residents in Greater Kailash-II, thus not meeting the criteria for public utility under section 2(15) of the Act. The CIT referenced the judgments in Kedia Jatiya Sahayak Sabha & Fund v. CIT and CIT v. Bel Employees Death Relief Fund & Service Benefit Fund Association, asserting that the society's objectives did not satisfy the test of public utility as they were for mutual benefit rather than public at large. The Accountant Member supported the CIT's view, stating that the society's objectives primarily benefited residents of Greater Kailash-II, a limited and identifiable group, thus failing the impersonal nature test required for public utility. The Judicial Member, however, argued that the society served a significant number of residents (~15,000), which could be considered a section of the public, satisfying the test of public utility as per Ahmedabad Rana Caste Association v. CIT. 2. Whether the society should be granted registration under section 12A of the Income-tax Act, 1961: The Judicial Member highlighted that the society's activities, such as health camps, cultural events, and civic amenities, benefited not only Greater Kailash-II residents but also the general public, including surrounding areas. The society had amended its memorandum to ensure income and property were used solely for its charitable aims, further supporting its claim. The Judicial Member also referenced Fifth Generation Education Society v. CIT and New Life Christ Evangelistic Association v. CIT, which clarified that at the registration stage, the focus should be on whether the objectives are charitable and activities are genuine, not on how income will be spent. The Third Member concluded that the society's objectives and activities extended beyond Greater Kailash-II, benefiting the general public of Delhi. The society's impersonal nature of benefits, as required by Ahmedabad Rana Caste Association, was satisfied, and the society was entitled to registration under section 12A. Conclusion: The appeal was allowed, granting the society registration under section 12A of the Income-tax Act, 1961, as its objectives and activities were deemed charitable, benefiting a well-defined section of the public.
|
