Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 1996 (6) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
1996 (6) TMI 260 - CEGAT, NEW DELHIExtract: .......iary. 10. emsp In view of the above discussions, it is proved beyond any doubt that the appellants had suppressed the production and did not record it in RG-1 register and removed this excess production without payment of duty. In this view of the matter and in view of the evidence discussed above, I uphold the impugned order and reject the appeal.
|