9911796707
|
Home
Issues Involved:
The judgment involves issues related to the justification of using evidence recorded without affording an opportunity for cross-examination and the assessment being vitiated due to lack of reasonable opportunity of being heard and failure to summon witnesses. Issue 1 - Evidence Recorded Without Opportunity for Cross-Examination: The case involved a reference u/s 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, where the Tribunal referred two questions of law to the High Court. The first question pertained to the justification in law of using evidence recorded behind the back of the applicant without affording an opportunity for cross-examination. The assessee, an individual carrying on a business of purchase and sale of silver ornaments, faced an addition to the assessment under section 69A of the Income-tax Act, 1961, due to unexplained silver ornaments found during a search. The explanation provided by the assessee regarding the source of the silver was not accepted as it was not found recorded in any books of account. The Tribunal affirmed the findings of the lower authorities, leading to the reference before the High Court. Issue 2 - Lack of Reasonable Opportunity and Failure to Summon Witnesses: The second question raised in the reference was whether the assessment was vitiated as the Inspecting Assistant Commissioner failed to give a reasonable opportunity of being heard and did not summon requested witnesses under section 131. The Inspecting Assistant Commissioner made an addition to the assessment, which was upheld by the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) and the Tribunal. The assessee contended that the subsequent affidavit filed by a key individual was not considered, leading to a breach of natural justice. However, the High Court held that the matter was more of merit rather than an apparent error for rectification, citing precedents where the Tribunal's decision was upheld despite similar circumstances. This judgment highlights the importance of procedural fairness in tax assessments and the limitations on rectification based on the scope of the law.
|
