Penalty on authorized signatory cannot be imposed under Rule 26 ...

Authorized Signatories Not Penalized u/r 26 for Non-Clandestine Removal or Improper Records; Main Appellants Penalized u/r 25.

December 5, 2017

Case Laws Central Excise AT

Penalty on authorized signatory cannot be imposed under Rule 26 on the ground that the goods were not removed outside the factory premises in clandestine manner and also for non maintenance of proper records, the main appellants have already been penalized under Rule 25 - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty on authorized signatory cannot be imposed under Rule 26 ...

Authorized Signatories Not Penalized u/r 26 for Non-Clandestine Removal or Improper Records; Main Appellants Penalized u/r 25.

December 5, 2017

Case Laws Central Excise AT

You may also like:

Clandestine removal and under valuation - private records - presumption - The Revenue has miserably failed to produce corroboration evidence on records so as to...

100% EOU - Clandestine removal - case of the department is on the ground that deemed export clearance were not genuine and were shown only on paper - The entire case of...

Clandestine removal - on the basis of third party records - As Revenue has failed to produce any supporting evidence in their favour, therefore, the charge of...

Clandestine removal - MS Ingots - the findings of clandestine removal cannot be upheld based upon the third party documents, unless there is clinching evidence of...

The DGFT issued Public Notice No. 01/2025-26 amending Appendix 4B of the Handbook of Procedures, 2023, updating the list of banks authorized by RBI to import gold and...

The CESTAT set aside the demand and penalties imposed on the grounds of alleged clandestine removal, holding that the charge was not substantiated by sufficient evidence....

Clandestine Removal - copper wire - assumption and presumption - no inquiries have been conducted from the persons whose names are appearing in the loose papers/kacchi...

Clandestine removal - job-work - The supply of the material for job work was nowhere recorded in any of the records of the appellant nor any document was issued....

Clandestine removal - suppression of production - Merely deposit of money at the time of investigation would not amount to acceptance of allegations of clandestine...

Dishonor of Cheque - drawer of the cheque versus authorised signatory - One can easily visualise the object of Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, will...

Penalty u/r 26 - in the present case it is not the case of the clandestine removal of the goods but non-receipt of the inputs and fraudulent availment of the credit...

Clandestine removal - CENVAT credit Demand - Penalty - shortage of goods - Mere signing of the chart alleging removal of finished goods cannot be treated as clear...

Clandestine production and removal - onus to prove - The submission of the revenue that by the recovery of the notebooks, they have discharged the burden and the onus to...

Clandestine removal - Corroborative evidences - stock recorded as per Income Tax Investigation - merely on the basis of income tax investigation the case of clandestine...

When the statements and records relied upon by the revenue are not considered to be sufficient ground for clandestine removal, in that case merely on the basis of...

Quick Updates: