Penalty u/s.271-C - non deduction of TDS on Leave Travel ...

Penalty u/s 271-C Not Applicable If High Court Admits Substantial Question of Law on TDS Non-Deduction.

February 20, 2020

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Penalty u/s.271-C - non deduction of TDS on Leave Travel Allowance (LTA) - reasonable cause for the failure - when the High Court admits substantial question of law on an addition, it becomes apparent that the addition is certainly debatable. In such circumstances no penalty can be levied u/s 271C. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s.271-C - non deduction of TDS on Leave Travel ...

Penalty u/s 271-C Not Applicable If High Court Admits Substantial Question of Law on TDS Non-Deduction.

February 20, 2020

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Penalty u/s 271-C - LTA exemption for TDS under head salary - High Court has admitted the question whether the Assessee is guilty of non deduction of tax at source or...

Penalty u/s 271C -LTA - Mere admission of the appeal by the High Court on the substantial questions of law as have been quoted above, would make it apparent that the...

Jurisdiction of civil court u/s 34 of SARFAESI Act was in question. Suit for declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction was rejected by lower courts under Order...

Non-deduction of TDS - When the assessee has submitted necessary declaration in Form Nos.15G/15H for non-deduction of TDS and also for reversal of TDS deduction on...

The High Court dismissed the appeal filed by the assessing officer against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, holding that no substantial question of law...

The Tribunal set aside the disallowance of short-term loss claimed by the assessee in the Profit and Loss Account, holding that the shares were acquired under a normal...

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - The Revenue argued that the assessee's actions constituted furnishing inaccurate particulars of income or concealing income. However, the High...

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - scope of Section 275(1A) - once substantial question of law against quantum additions are admitted by Hon’ble HC u/s 260A, the tribunal shall...

Substantial question of law to be made out u/s 260A or not? - Undisclosed income surrendered during the Search and Seizure action - to be taxed at normal rate or tax...

Addition u/s 68 - substantial question of law - The Supreme court has held that, the jurisdiction of the High Court to interfere with the orders passed by the Courts...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that every non-compliance with a notice u/s 142(1) gives a separate cause of action for levying penalty u/s 271(1)(b)....

Penalty u/s.271(1)(c) - Nature of interest income - capital receipt or revenue receipt - This being a highly debatable issue and once there is a debate as assessee’s...

Penalty for non deduction of tax at source - bona fide belief proved - penalty set aside - AT

The case pertains to additions made by the Assessing Officer on account of bogus share application money and commission for bogus accommodation entries. The ITAT deleted...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - non-compliance of notice issues - if the quantum proceedings itself are declared to be bad in law and quashed , then any non compliance on the...

Quick Updates: