Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
VAT - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights April 2016 Year 2016 This

Reassessment of Return u/s 34 of DVAT - It is not understood how ...


High Court Invalidates Reassessment Notice Under DVAT Act; Questions Delegation of Authority by Special Commissioner.

April 7, 2016

Case Laws     VAT and Sales Tax     HC

Reassessment of Return u/s 34 of DVAT - It is not understood how the Special Commissioner (Special Zone) could have delegated powers in terms of Section 67(2) of DVAT Act and in particular, the power of reopening the reassessment to the Assistant Commissioner (VAT Audit) - Notice quashed - HC

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Reassessment action initiated based on Section 148 notice and subsequent Section 148A(b) notice violated the First Proviso to Section 149(1) and was barred by the...

  2. Reassessment u/s 147 - validity of notice - reasons for reopening the assessment have been recorded by the jurisdictional AO viz. the Dy. CIT, Circle 2, Jamnagar but the...

  3. Revision u/s 263 - validity of notice as issued by the ITO who is below the rank of ld. PCIT - The statute never permitted in section 263 for delegation of power to the...

  4. The High Court examined the validity of reassessment notices issued u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act, considering the sanction requirement u/s 151 and the impact of the...

  5. Validity of reopening an assessment and the legality of issuing a new Show Cause Notice u/s 148-A(b) after the conclusion of initial reassessment proceedings. The key...

  6. The High Court quashed the reassessment proceedings initiated by the Assessing Officer u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act, holding it to be a case of "change of opinion" and...

  7. Validity of reassessment order - Notice sent on wrong (old) E-mail ID - The petitioner company had two email addresses, one used until 2019 and another operational since...

  8. The High Court examined the jurisdiction of the Assessing Officer (AO) and the prescribed income-tax authority to issue notices u/s 143(2) of the Income Tax Act. It held...

  9. Demand of differential tax - The present show cause notices are reassessment of reassessment for the same period - Such authority is not available to Revenue.

  10. The ITAT held that the reassessment notice u/s 148 for AY 2014-15 and AY 2015-16 was time-barred. For AY 2014-15, the assessee failed to respond within the two-week...

  11. ITAT invalidated reassessment proceedings due to jurisdictional defects in notice issuance under s.148. ITO Ward 3(2), Bulandsahar transferred assessee's records to ITO...

  12. Reassessment of tax - the order of assessment, was not in existence on the date of issuing notice for reassessment under Section 22 (1) of the Act of 2005. Therefore,...

  13. Validity of SCN - opportunity of pre-show cause notice consultation - As the stand taken by the respondent authorities in the impugned show cause notice dated 31.12.2020...

  14. HC invalidated reassessment proceedings against the petitioner under Section 148A, finding a critical procedural defect. The AO's notice failed to substantiate the claim...

  15. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that the reassessment notices issued u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act for the assessment years 2013-14, 2014-15, and 2015-16...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates